At long last, here is my write-up of the 2011 Esoteric Book Conference. For all of the information you’d ever need on the 2011 Esoteric Book Conference, see their website.

The first presenter at the conference was Brian Butler, who (through no fault of his own) had some technical difficulties, which then delayed the beginning of his presentation, and there was a bit of a knock-on effect for the remainder of the conference. Alas, these things happen. Butler has done a lot of work with Kenneth Anger, which seems quite interesting to me in many ways, but I did not have a chance to speak with him during the remainder of the conference, and he didn’t say anything about his own work during the course of his talk. His presentations was called “Marjorie Cameron: The Rituals of the Wormwood Star,” and detailed the life of Marjorie Cameron, the “incarnation of Babalon” and “scarlet woman” to Jack W. Parsons (whom Alan Moore wrote a short comic about, which was banned, but later published by Top Shelf Publications; Cameron is in one or two frames of the comic). Butler’s presentation used a great deal of visual imagery from Cameron, including several film clips (some of which are rare or had hardly been seen previously).
While not a direct critique of Butler himself, I have to agree with something I heard elsewhere during the course of the conference: namely, why were there two presentations on female magicians/esotericists/occultists (Marjorie Cameron and Ida Craddock), but neither were presented by women, and why was there only one scheduled event in the presentations program which featured women? (Granted, that was a panel of about seven women, but giving seven women the same time allotment that every other male speaker was given alone seems a bit…well, slanted, to say the least.) The presentations in earlier years, on Ithell Colquhoun (in the first year) and Florence Farr (in the second year) were both done by women…so, why not another introduction to a particular female occultists by a female scholar/practitioner this year–or, heavens forfend, TWO!?! While the EBC has been an event where there have been more male than female (or other gendered) presenters every year, it’s a noticeable matter; and given that the majority of my own associates, friends, and co-religionists at the EBC have been women, it is a factor I take very seriously. The panel on the second day (which I’ll detail later) did feature two “repeat offenders” of the EBC (which is to say, both of whom presented in the past at the EBC): Brandy Williams (who presented on the Chaldean Oracles at the first EBC) and Amy Hale (who presented on Ithell). Anyway…

The second presentation was by Robert Bartlett, an alchemist who is local to the Seattle area, and whom I have met on a few previous occasions, whose presentation was (strangely enough!) called “Alchemy in the Twenty-First Century.” It was an excellent overview of some of the history of alchemy, Bartlett’s own training in this matter, and some basic theories underlying alchemical work.

The third presentation was by Michael Staley of Starfire Publishing, who has presented in past years, and who is heavily involved in the work of Kenneth Grant. I have found Staley’s previous presentations to be a bit boring, to be honest, but I decided to give this one a try. It was called “Transmitting the Sacred Fire: Transformation and Identity in Austin Osman Spare,” and given the subject, I thought it would be worth it–and I was not at all disappointed. I hope to delve more deeply into some of Spare’s work in the future as the result of this talk (though others in previous years also had me curious, and Spare is a favorite of Alan Moore as well), but I was particularly struck by a piece Spare did called “Mind and Body” that reminded me of a piece that I’d like to see produced in relation to some other work with which I’m currently engaged. The picture below by Spare is not the one I saw in the presentation, and wasn’t shown during the presentation, but it’s striking nonetheless, and also turns out to be reminiscent of some of the images I’ve had in relation to that same project…So, enough words from me for the moment, just enjoy this image, which is called “Now for Reality.”

Nice, innit?

Fourth up was Gordan Djurdjevic, who is the author of Masters of Magical Powers: The Nath Yogis in the Light of Esoteric Notions (VDM: 2008) and India and the Occult: The Influence of South Asian Spirituality on Western Esoteric Tradition (Equinox: 2012, forthcoming), and co-editor, with Henrik Bogdan, of an anthology called Occultism in a Global Perspective (Equinox: 2013, forthcoming), all of which I’d be interested in getting at some stage. Gordan’s presentation was called “Making The Mundane Magical: Aleister Crowley’s Magus Initiation and the Practice of Esoteric Hermeneutics.” And while a great deal of what was discussed in this presentation was not “new” material to me, nonetheless Dr. Djurdjevic’s presentation was lively, humorous, extremely enjoyable, and incredibly inspirational. A particular phrase that Crowley said, and an ideal he attempted to uphold, was that a magus is constituted through action, not being or identity, and that’s an idea I can certainly get behind (and in fact was kicking around on the bus down to Seattle for the conference!). Thus, every action in one’s life becomes a “text” and a potential test for a person living such a life; and, similar statements to this were marshaled from a wide variety of sources and religious traditions in the remainder of the presentation. On the whole, quite excellent!

Next was the first part of a two-part performance/presentation by Orryelle Defenestrate Bascule (whose various projects and group websites seem to be inaccessible at present, unfortunately), who presented last year as well. He was the severed head of Orpheus, who gave a rather interesting piece on the importance of bodies, and then through various practices of breathing and chanting (which the audience was invited to join in on…alas, I did not, because such things are extremely difficult for me without notice and sufficient preparation; but, the visuals alone were quite mind-bending, at least for me!), a body was re-constructed for him that was made from a series of pieces of sculpture that were displayed and re-arranged throughout the conference previously, so that in the end Orpheus became Baphomet. While it was an interesting piece of ritual theatre, and at times quite beautiful in its language, I can’t say I entirely buy the monism of “Orpheus = Dionysos = Baphomet,” and certain other critiques of the performance that I heard from some of my friends (i.e. it culminated in the rather large cock of Baphomet being attached to the figure) continued in some of the worries about gender and its lack of equal representation at the conference. Oh well…can’t win ‘em all.

The final presentation on the first day was by Craig Williams, an ayurvedic practitioner and an associate of David Beth, who presented at last year’s EBC. Craig’s presentation was called “Voice of the Dark Goddess,” and dealt with primarily three of the Dasha Mahavidyas: Bhairavi, Chinnamasta, and Dumavati. The utility of these goddesses for work involving purification of various types, and facing particular challenges, was emphasized. A great deal of time was spent on both de-mystifying but also debunking certain aspects of chakras and chakra work, and attention was also given to the various levels of reality. It was pointed out that the “dream level” of reality, which is often seen as superior to the “waking level,” is just one further step along the process, and in Indian contexts, it’s not really given as much attention as it is in the west–astral and dream experiences can be just as illusory as things in waking life, so why attach to them? He also had some very practical ayurvedic ideas sprinkled in here and there, which I found particularly useful and personally relevant to my own situation, including certain chakra associations, physical debilities, and the correlation between these and lack of restorative sleep. While I do not think that dream work, thus, is completely useless (indeed, it is very important in many Western systems, and there’s nothing wrong with that, and it doesn’t mean that Eastern ideas are automatically superior, better, or “more right,” in my view…!?!), nonetheless this had an interesting effect. That night, I had some of the best sleep I’ve had in a long time, with no dreams of note, which is to say, none at all…and, that’s very odd for me. It even took a few days for me to start having them again, for good or ill. But, in any case…One of the other major points that Williams made was that critical skills, serious intellectual study, and so forth are not optional EVER, and when one moves to higher and more advanced levels of practice, one must continue with these. This sort of message is not heard nearly enough in spirituality generally, so I greatly appreciated it. This turned out to be one of the most useful, on a practical level, presentations of the entire conference, in my opinion.
That night, various things occurred, various people were seen, and I did not attend the musical performances, which I have likewise not done in previous years. Seeing people I don’t get to see much was far more important to me.

The second day’s presentations began with one by Dr. Vere Chappell, whose talk was entitled “Ida Craddock: Sexual Outlaw & Erotic Mystic,” which is also the title of his recent book (which I would love to pick up at some stage!). Dr. Chappell noted that a person no less than Aleister Crowley recommended one of Craddock’s works as essential to every serious magical library, and Chappell has edited that particular work (and several others by Craddock) in his book, so…! Craddock did some pioneering work not only in sex magic, but in sex therapy, and was put through the ringer for having done so, as she was severely persecuted by a person whose name I will not mention, until she was imprisoned repeatedly after several trumped up charges in kangaroo court situations, and eventually committed suicide to prove the point that what the person persecuting her was doing was entirely wrong…and, public opinion agreed with her after her death. After inquiring a bit, and overhearing some other conversations with Dr. Chappell after his presentation, it seems that Craddock had some homoerotic tendencies herself, but never acted on them. She might make an interesting Sanctus for the Ekklesía Antínoou, but in any case is a very intriguing figure, and I hope that Dr. Chappell’s work does end up reviving interest in and knowledge of her very much!

The next talk was by Dr. George J. Sieg, who I met at last year’s conference. He spoke on “The Concept of the Aeon in Mesocosmic Magic.” This was, undoubtedly, the most “academic” of the presentations, and Dr. Sieg’s speed of speech was quite difficult to keep up with in terms of taking serious notes; however, everything was easily understandable and quite clear. The beginning of his talk was spent in defining “aeonics” as the aspect of esotericism and occultism which deals with the generation and transmission of worldviews in the context of beliefs concerning cycles of time. Later parts of his discussion touched on the antinomian tendencies of many spiritual movements, starting in the 12th century C.E. with Joachim of Fiore’s idea of the “age of the spirit,” which eventually lead to the “Free Spirit Heresy” (which, contra Dr. Sieg, was never a sort of brotherhood as he suggested; the idea that it was originates in papal propaganda, particularly in relation to a beloved figure I know and have dealt with previously on this blog, Marguerite Porete), but also various radical right-wing movements that have used such ideas, and the need for action in the world to bring about these new eras. Given that it was the tenth anniversary of September 11 when this talk was being given, reference was certainly made to that event, and a moment of silence was (very tastefully, I thought) observed in the middle of his presentation in light of it.
After lunch–which I spent mostly discussing Ekklesía Antínoou- and Antinous-related matters with several co-religionists over a hot dog and soda from the Center House as we watched the surging masses play in the gigantic Seattle Center spherical fountain (which is loaded with nymphs!), the conference’s panel presentation occurred. It was called “Ladies of the Lodge: Women of Today’s Golden Dawn Speak on the Practice of Magick,” and was organized by Barbara Cormack, whose edited book on this subject is coming out soon. As mentioned previously, Brandy Williams and Amy Hale were both on this panel, as were several others whose names I was not quick enough to note down (my apologies for that!). It was an interesting and useful discussion, though I somewhat wish that there would have been more of a note toward the fact that, despite a large number of women attending the conference, the disparity in women presenters was (and has been) noteworthy…but that may have been a bit off-topic. At one point, the issue of race was raised, and the lack of women of color on the panel was noted; though I do have to disagree that the Egyptian deities should be understood as “black,” because even though Egyptians are Africans, they are not quite the same as “black Africans” and always understood themselves to be different from the Nubians, the Ethiopians, and others. In any case…

The “now you know–and knowing’s half the battle” award for the conference goes to the presentation which followed, which was by John Major Jenkins, who is not only an authority on the 2012 phenomenon, but is really one of, if not the, originator of its popular knowledge. It was excellent to hear his talk, “Lord Jaguar and 2012: A Maya King Reaches Through Time,” which not only gave a very detailed amount of background into the entire 2012 phenomenon and how the date is determined and what it signifies, but also outlined some of the newest discoveries in relation to it. Needless to say, the world is going to go on after 2012 (and I’m sorry if that upsets some of you!), it’s just that it will be YET ANOTHER turning of the age…and since the millennium, the Age of Aquarius, and now the 2012 cosmic cycle’s re-setting are all taking place in a relatively small amount of time, I think it can safely be said that if we didn’t get the point before, we ought to get it now…at least from an aeonics viewpoint, to use Dr. Sieg’s terminology. Lord Jaguar, with any luck, will help us to bring it about when the date of the Solstice in 2012 arrives (and given that’s a date sacred to Antinous Epiphanes, one of his Dionysian aspects, I think he may have something to say about it all as well!).

The final talk of the conference was by Justin Patrick Moore, a librarian, artist, and member of several different occult orders and groups. His talk was called “The Library Angel and Its Oracle,” and it not only dealt with the figure of the “Library Angel,” a.k.a. Harahel (and various other similar names), but a great deal besides that concerns anyone and everyone who loves books, who uses them, and who is of a magical or spiritual mindset. There was a great deal of fun wordplay in his presentation (“the Library Angel is not into one-night stands; quick-reads are part of an ongoing textual relationship with the Angel”), as well as reflection on bibliophilia, on the importance of freedom of the press and non-censorship, and a great many related topics. He related many personal experiences of the Library Angel’s oracle of coincidence and synchronicity in relation to books, which fit with my own early experiences of Antinous and how quite often, the right book would suddenly appear in the library, or the necessary pages would be the ones to which I’d open by chance…and this has happened several times since that presentation as well! Moore said that the Library Angel is not only useful in libraries as a research assistant, but also as a literary agent–and, since I’ve got further books that I hope to finish soon, I shall keep that in mind!
The final event of the conference, at least at the main venue, was the second part of Orryelle’s presentation, in which Orpheus was torn apart by the maenads, and had some words to say about it. It wasn’t quite as effective as the first one, I thought, but it also had its moments.
[Though I have to say--and this goes not just for Orryelle's presentation, but several of the others as well--that the level of Greek pronunciation was rather lacking in many cases, which surprised me a great deal in relation to several of the speakers. Oh well...how to handle "c" when it is a transliterated chi, and when it should actually be a kappa, was a particular problem...]
There was a Golden Dawn prosperity ritual after the main conference was over, but I was not able to attend that (which is a pity, because I could certainly use some prosperity!), nor the after-party, due to my foot problems. But, I’m happy I was able to attend the entirety of the actual events at the main venue, and I was happy to not only enjoy all of the presentations (though certainly some more than others, though none were at all wastes of time), but to see some wonderful friends and co-religionists, to sell a few books and trade for others, and to see that no matter how bad the modern book publishing scene seems to be, that there is a small group of people who will always prefer books as physical objects to blips on an electronic screen. And, hurrah for that, needless to say.
So, all praise and thanks to the gods who make books possible, especially in my own case: Thoth, Seshat, Hermes Logios, and Antinous!
I commented to the organizers about the gender disparity. The response was “get more women to submit proposals.” I suppose I ought to consider submitting one on ogam sigils and “bindogams” in modern magical work, and include some of the glyphs in the Book of Ballymote and a few other curiosities I’ve seen around. Ian Corrigan has a system of ogam sigils based on the Féige Find that’s kind of interesting, resulting in curved rather than angular sigils, but the few that I’ve seen seem kind of limited. Still, it would be interesting to present that as another path of exploration for the system.
An excellent review of the conference!
By: Erynn on September 20, 2011
at 11:01 pm
Thanks–glad you liked it!
I was talking with Galina, and she said she’d be interested in coming to Seattle if she were presenting at something like the EBC. Perhaps yourself and her can both submit proposals next year–you do ogam, she does runes…?!? You showed some of Corrigan’s work to me a long while back; it’s interesting, certainly, but might be of somewhat limited usage outside of certain contexts and languages…I’d think one would have to do it in some form of Irish for it to work, and it would probably help if one were a fénnid/fili as well…?!?
By: aediculaantinoi on September 21, 2011
at 5:13 pm
That would be pretty interesting, definitely. I agree that ogam sigilization as Ian does it would probably work best in Irish, and would definitely be context-driven. “Bindrune” type ogams would be an easier approach for many people, I suspect, but if I do a presentation on the topic I’d definitely like to cover the approaches I’ve seen out there.
By: Erynn on September 21, 2011
at 5:42 pm
Having been involved in one way or another with the conference since its inception, I too have had some difficulties with the gender disparity of presenters. I think part of this might have to do with the focus of conversation – i.e. magic (most specifically Western Ceremonial Magic) and not as much a focus on paganism which, while definitely related, the former is overwhelmingly male-dominated. To this end, I definitely support and encourage more women to get interested and write proposals and support them whole-heartedly.
As for the phallic focus on the Baphomet, Oryelle specifically meant that particular anatomical piece to also be reminiscent of the lost phallus of Osiris. Upon closer examination, you’ll also find that the image creating the phallus was actually a female figure.
By: Michael Strojan on September 21, 2011
at 3:28 pm
With any luck, various folks will start submitting more proposals. As I commented to Erynn, herself and Galina Krasskova would be excellent people to have…imagine, a whole morning of alternate (actual!) alphabet occultisms! Get a woman who can do Enochian, and they’d be golden!
As for Orryelle’s intentions and such–fair enough, but it didn’t work for me. I don’t really know if having one’s dick be a female figure really addresses the issue, though–I mean, in a certain sense, that’s the apotheosis of sexual objectification, in a way. (While I’m stroking my optimistically-large psychic phallus, it’s great because it’s ACTUALLY a woman who I’m pleasuring as well…but I’m not really, I’m just using that image because it appeals to me…and, it’s not even an actual woman…) I dunno…I’m a bit of a skeptic when one’s gender variance is just “be male AND female,” and yet the femininity doesn’t really quite seem to be there, or is done in such a male manner that it sort of loses its effectiveness.
By: aediculaantinoi on September 21, 2011
at 5:19 pm
What you said. It wasn’t working for me at all.
Art depends on perception. What works for one person doesn’t work for another. Poetry’s like that too.
By: Erynn on September 21, 2011
at 5:40 pm
Thanks for pointing that out Michael. The reason for the phallus being the final ‘missing piece’ in relation to the Osiris (also torn apart and recoagulated) was indeed expressed in the verse, and it was supposed to be an actual bronze (nearest to actual gold i could afford!) piece but beings sent seamail from Australia due to weight it didn’t arrive in time (mythically apt as the missing piece -maybe a fish ate it en route?) and a wax copy had to be substituted.
Its funny how nobody has said anything about the figure also having breasts, which were also sung about…
By: Orryelle on October 3, 2011
at 5:32 pm
Hi Orryell
I did note that you sang about breasts, but I have to admit that on the figure they didn’t look particularly breasty, if you will. If they had been more pronounced, I would most likely have had an easier time conceptually balancing them out with the phallus, which was much more exaggerated. In that kind of light, exaggeration helps a lot. Subtleties are lost, and the figure came across as far more “masculine” than “androgynous” despite the oral accompaniment. I suspect that a bronze phallus would only have continued to exaggerate the masculinity in an even more marked way.
By: Erynn on October 4, 2011
at 12:18 am
I agree the breasts could have been more prominent, but how the figure came together on the metal skeleton when assembled was not exactly as I had envisioned it when creating the pieces, and only a month in Seattle before the EBC for re-coagulation of the piece.
Of course the bronze phallus would have come across as masculine, but it does accentuate the Osiris aspect being the reason for it being the final, culminative piece. Unlike the wax one it also has snakes entwining like Baphomet’s traditional Caduceus ‘staff’, and the female figure therein is also more evident: http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.10150282946130329.381573.750595328&type=1
By: Orryelle on October 5, 2011
at 5:29 pm
Orryelle, is there anywhere else that the information you linked to is available, for those of us who aren’t on FaceBook?
By: aediculaantinoi on October 5, 2011
at 6:25 pm
[...] Lupus also shares his experiences at the recent Esoteric Book Conference in Seattle: While the EBC has been an event where there have [...]
By: Weekly roundup of interesting links « The House of Vines on September 21, 2011
at 8:58 pm
[...] has written up a nice post summarizing the presentations at this years Esoteric Book Conference. You can find it here. Though I must say that I am not a librarian, in the technical, accredited with a Masters Degree, [...]
By: Aediculae Antioni’s Esoteric Book Conference Write Up « Sothis Medias on September 23, 2011
at 12:26 pm
[...] obligation”: namely, buying books. However, I resisted this urge particularly well on another bibliophile’s greatest fantasy/nightmare occasion two weeks [...]
By: A Holiday of Bibliophilia…?!? « Aedicula Antinoi: A Small Shrine of Antinous on September 24, 2011
at 2:41 am
[...] many friends and well-informed ritualists, artists and occultists from around the world. Probably the best description of the event in the weeks following, written by my dear friend and co-religionist, P. Sufenas Virius Lupus, also [...]
By: An Apology for Baphomet and SOLVE et COAGULA « Digital Enchiridion on September 24, 2011
at 2:15 pm
[...] potentially wider possible readership. Considering my recent attendance at, and enthusiasm for, the Esoteric Book Conference, perhaps a publisher like Three Hands Press or Ouroboros would be interested in doing these as a [...]
By: I’m in a miscellaneous mood… « Aedicula Antinoi: A Small Shrine of Antinous on September 29, 2011
at 8:34 pm
Great detailed review. Thank you!
Regarding your comments re: gender in my performancy, please see Michael Strojan’s response and my reply to that above. I’d also like to note that by comparing similar aspects of Their mythos I was not saying Orpheus=Dionysos=Baphomet. However if you look into Thracian (pre-Greek) culture you will find Orpheus was apparently originally a Thracian king, and their kings were successive avatars of Dionysos.
My own idea of the oracular Head of Baphomet as worshipped by the Templars being the head of Orpheus rediscovered (it floated away, immortal, at the end of the Greek myth after all) is poetic license. For a deeper understanding of these ideas please see my attached URL and/or my ‘Bulgaria(Thrace) Adventures’ note on facebook.
And since you synchronistically posted that particular piece of Spare’s and also wrote much about gender, I have to ask if you saw my counterpoint, ‘Now for Surreality’ on exhibit -which shows a woman with a phallic quill betwixt her legs (rather than a ‘stick in her vagina’ as the woman complained to the Golden Dawn panel. People should look more carefully before criticising!)…?
By: Orryelle on October 3, 2011
at 5:47 pm
Hello Orryelle, thanks for reading and chiming in!
I commented quite heavily on Michael’s apologia piece already, not long after he wrote it. I realize that myself and some of the others who had similar critiques are probably in the minority on this, and that’s all right. Whatever the particular ideas that influenced you, or that you were putting across, happened to be, they may not always “land” with certain individuals, and I think that’s really the case here. I can certainly respect your work as an artist and performer, and I did enjoy many aspects of those performances, but I didn’t get the same experience of the entirety that many people did, and that’s just the nature of the beast where art is concerned, I think.
I enjoyed your presentation at the 2011 conference (on your ongoing work and the “Fourth Face of Hekate”) very much indeed, found it inspiring and thought-provoking and very productive for some of my own reflections since that time; and, I hope one day to be able to afford to buy copies of your current and future Tela Quadrivium series as well. This one, though, didn’t have the same sort of effect, and I don’t think it’s any fault of your own, but likewise I don’t think that further explanations of why I should find it good or moving (from yourself or from others like Michael) are necessarily going to help me either, or change my opinions. I don’t think it’s a matter of “not understanding” the piece, or requiring a “deeper understanding,” because I understood it pretty well, it just didn’t do anything for me and didn’t have the intended effect for me. If the reception of art were entirely a matter of understanding and rationality, things would be in so many respects easier and more instrumental for us as artists, and thank all the gods that they’re not, for good and ill!
I’ve been involved in some neo-Thracian devotional activities in the last year, and am finding the material very worthwhile and intriguing for all sorts of reasons. I was fascinated that the bits of your Baphomet sculpture pictured in the conference program–one of the hands/arms–was actually posed in the Sabazios gesture, and wondered if you might have been following that up in some manner or not, or if it was just pure happenstance. Michael said it was the Baphomet gesture as well, and thus that was probably what you intended it to be, but given the Thracian connections/context with Orpheus, I went to Sabazios more readily in my own mind.
I didn’t get to see the art exhibition as much as I would have liked, because I wasn’t able to spend very much time actually on my feet that weekend due to some health issues. However, I was intrigued by the mention that the woman had during the question session of the Women of the Golden Dawn panel (and thought that entire bit and her overall message was rather odd…however, having interacted with her briefly, and not by choice, earlier in the conference, I’m not exactly surprised by her comments either).
By: aediculaantinoi on October 4, 2011
at 2:15 am
[...] the reactions of myself and some of my co-religionists to a few of the events at the Esoteric Book Conference (and see also this entry on Michael Sebastian Lvx’s blog that attempts to be an apologia for [...]
By: Seshat « Aedicula Antinoi: A Small Shrine of Antinous on October 3, 2011
at 7:21 pm
There are a few photos from the Solve et Coagula performances at http://www.crossroads.wild.net.au/morph.htm and http://www.crossroads.wild.net.au/orpheus.htm
More to be added gradually…
For those intrigued enough from this discussion to see for themselves (if in the vicinity) we are the doing the show again (the 2 pieces put back into 1 as originally devised) in Portland on Weds 26th Oct. Details at top URL above…
The bronze phallus finally arrived from Oz and above discussions have inspired me to create a vagina (composed of a male figure -with phallus as clitoris- even as the phallus is composed of a female figure) for the Baphomet statue as well as making the breasts more prominent!
By: Orryelle on October 18, 2011
at 5:03 pm
Very good! Thanks for all of this, Orryelle!
How does one wish “good luck” on a performance like this? “Break a leg” just doesn’t quite feel right to me…?!?
By: aediculaantinoi on October 18, 2011
at 6:57 pm
[...] myself, but for whoever gets all of them once I am dead. (Let’s keep on the good side of the Library Angel Harahel, shall we?) Having utilized many books of formerly-living people in the special collections of [...]
By: “Dirty Books” « Aedicula Antinoi: A Small Shrine of Antinous on January 20, 2012
at 5:58 am
[...] a “doomsday” prophecy, it’s a sign of renewal and a new beginning. (If in doubt, read more here on this matter from last year’s Esoteric Book [...]
By: Fire and Water « Aedicula Antinoi: A Small Shrine of Antinous on May 8, 2012
at 3:56 pm