Posted by: aediculaantinoi | February 29, 2012

The Bisextile Year

Today is a very unusual day: i.e. the “leap-day” of February 29th, which only happens once every four years. In my time as a devotee of Antinous, this day has only happened twice before, and this is thus the third time it has occurred since 2002.

Many ancient societies reckoned leap-year in their calendars. The Romans had an interesting way of reckoning it, which gives its name to the present blog entry. Because February was at the end of their year, and was the final month in their calendar, February got an additional day before the Kalends of March. However, it was not reckoned as “the 29th of February” for them. Instead, it was reckoned as a “Bisextile Year.” Now, I know what you’re thinking: what do bisexuals have to do with tile-work? Sure, lots of Romans were what we’d call “bisexual,” and I’m sure more than one Roman who made roofing tiles or tiles for baths was bisexual…but, that didn’t mean that they got leap-years off or any such thing! ;)

The reason that the year was “bisextile” is because on a leap-year, instead of “adding” another day to February (which would throw the whole calendar off), instead they simply repeated one particular day twice: the day of VI Kal. Mart., or February 24th, which was the festival of the Regifugium. You might ask, “But, February 24th isn’t 6 days before the first of March!” Actually, in Roman counting–which used inclusive numbering–it was. February 28th would have been 2 before the Kalends of March (II Kal. Mart.), February 27th was 3 before, etc. So, February 24th is 6 before, and it was thus repeated twice–hence, “bisextile year.” As Regifugium was an important festival marking the end of tyranny in Rome and the beginning of the Roman republic with the exile of the king Tarquin the Proud, it deserved to be celebrated multiple times when the occasion allowed…

From what I understand, in the period before I was a part of the Neos Alexandria group–though this may only be legend (!?!)–I heard that it was suggested that the birth of Antinous be celebrated on the leap-year day that would exist in the calendar, whether that fell on February 29th or some other day (as the calendar is re-calculated each year). It is an intriguing suggestion, but since Egypt, Lanuvium, and (presumably) other places all celebrated Antinous’ birthday on November 27th, it isn’t really necessary to do that. Nonetheless, it’s an intriguing and creative manner to suggest that date for a particular thing, and particularly for the birth of a deity who is perpetually youthful…Using one’s creative and intuitive notions for creating new traditions like this, in absence of more definite and attested information, is only to be commended and applauded whenever it can take place, I think.

And, one place to experience such things is dreams, I’ve found. The following dream is one that happened to me earlier today–I am not necessarily going to put too much stock in it as something upon which to build further practice, but it is interesting all the same, and does touch on the topic of the emergence of new and previously unknown deities, syncretism, and the like.

In the dream, I was at PantheaCon (big surprise!). I was up in someone’s hotel room, and I was introducing various people to some new deities. One of them was a daughter or sister of Sobek, who–like Neith–was something like 2/3 female and 1/3 male, and she was also crocodilian. (I can’t remember her name at present, though…I think it had an “s” in it, and perhaps began with that letter…?!?) Then there was supposed to be a further male deity, but the other one that got introduced was a syncretistic goddess who had as the attribute on her head a hand with five fingers, and then at the end of each of the fingers was the usual attribute of an Egyptian goddess. (Which reminds me of Sabazios, personally…only, female…?!?) So, this goddess combined five goddesses, and those goddesses were (if I remember correctly): Ma’at, Hathor, Nephthys, Nekhbet, and Sothis/Sopdet. (The entries linked to there are all from Edward Butler’s excellent Goddesses and Gods of the Ancient Egyptians: A Theological Encyclopedia, which I cannot recommend highly enough!) I also recall there was some sort of symbol of this syncretistic goddess that was a round shield with a row of studs around the outside, that as I was looking at it seemed to suggest a breast or a nipple to me…

And, as this was all going on, I was quasi-aspecting Set, and was about to go further with introducing whomever the male deity was, but then someone said “I think we need a Set break for a moment,” whereupon I and a whole chorus of people out of nowhere starting to sing “Heartbreak Hotel,” only it was “Set-Break Hotel.”

Yeah, weird.

Strange…all of those goddesses, with the exception of Sothis/Sopdet, were involved in some way, whether directly or indirectly (i.e. by mentioning frequently or occasionally, etc.), with my experience at PantheaCon this year. Certainly, combining the attributes and associations of those various goddesses would make for an interesting and potent figure, I think. And the idea of a “female Sobek” is also not new to me and my own experience, but I don’t know if I have the right name for such a being yet. Hmm…However, as mentioned above, I don’t want to place too much emphasis on all of this as a new epiphany of a syncretistic deity or deities; it could have just been a “garbage disposal” dream that simply involved a lot of potent and intriguing divine figures, but it may not really mean anything. Hard to say…

I don’t know, what do all of you think?

As for yourselves, I wish you each the blessings of many gods and goddesses on this day, this strange not-quite-here-but-not-quite-there day, and I look forward to speaking further with you all in the “new year” when the Kalends of March arrives tomorrow! Ave Ave Antinoe!


Responses

  1. Thoth was sometimes known as “The Great of Five” (wr tiw); he receives this epithet in the Book of Thoth, in a passage that is cryptic enough, but does clearly have something to do with how one is supposed to hold the pen. Some have thought that this epithet referred to five deities, some kind of alternative to the Hermopolitan Ogdoad, but I think that the passage from the Book of Thoth kind of settles the matter in favor of a reference to the five fingers of the hand.

    • Really fascinating! Thanks so much for mentioning that!

      I’m almost tempted now to wonder if the five goddesses mentioned, where I had expected a male deity to be introduced instead, might in some sense have been “concealing” Thoth in their midst, and that perhaps each of the goddesses is in some sense a “blessing” or an “attribute” that should be attached to each finger of the hand in relation to Thoth and some of my future practices with him…hmm. Again, possibly not, as that may have just been a random dream of randomness, but anyway…

      Thanks, as ever, for your excellent ongoing work! I mentioned (and gave references to) “polycentric polytheism” at PantheaCon, and that went over very well indeed!

      • Also, there is a rather cryptic running theme in some of the Egyptian resurrection literature about counting one’s fingers, as part of the construction of the netherworld ferry-boat; see spells 396-398 of the Coffin Texts.

      • Ooh! Very interesting indeed!

        I don’t have the Coffin Texts at this point–is there an online version, I wonder?

  2. Well…Circle of Cerridwen is considering getting a suite next year…;) And considering we’re big syncretics….

    • I love the way you think! ;)

      We shall have more to speak of soon…I’ve been ridiculously busy, but will e-mail you in the coming days!

      • Excellent! Looking forward to chatting with you about this stuff! :)

  3. “Nonetheless, it’s an intriguing and creative manner to suggest that date for a particular thing, and particularly for the birth of a deity who is perpetually youthful…Using one’s creative and intuitive notions for creating new traditions like this, in absence of more definite and attested information, is only to be commended and applauded whenever it can take place, I think.”

    It’s statements like this that make one wonder whether he is being talked about. ;)

    Or maybe I’m just tooting my own lower horn as it were. :D

    Either way that’s a funny coincidence – legend or not!

    Ace

    • One is being talked about, sort of, in that statement! ;)

      And, I’m a fan of self-horn-tooting, so please don’t ever hesitate to do so!

      I was only told of this “legend” a short while back myself, and it is a very interesting coincidence indeed, considering what you’ve revealed to me (and the wider EA world) in the last day or so. Wonders never cease, eh?

  4. I think that was an epic dream, because only truly epic dreams contain spontaneous musical numbers.

    • Thanks for the vote of confidence! ;) I wish that particular musical number had been “better,” however…though it was sort of funny to have me, as Set, singing “I get so lonely, baby, I get so lonely / I get so lonely, I could die…” Lots of laughs there for me internally, certainly!

  5. Unfortunately the Coffin Texts are not online, but I can give you the relevant passages, as they’re short. They are all quite cryptic, because they’re built largely around puns. Basically, they consist of exchanges between the netherworld ferryman and the subject.

    Hence in spell 397, which is the fullest version, Aken challenges the subject, “As for what you have said, that you would ferry over to the place where this august God is, this august God will say: ‘Have you ferried over to me a man who does not know the number of his fingers?’,” to which the subject replies, “I will say, ‘I know the number of my fingers’.” Aken: “Count, so that you may let me hear.” The subject says: “Take the one, take the double one [i.e., the second finger], quench it [or perhaps 'annul it'; a pun, at any rate, on the word for 'three'] …, remove it [the fourth finger, a pun on the word 'four'], give to me [pun on 'five'], what is well disposed toward me [pun on 'six'], do not let go of it [pun on 'seven'], have no pity on it [pun on 'eight'], brighten the Eye [pun on 'nine'], give the Eye to me [pun on 'ten'].”

    Other versions are shorter, and only count the five fingers of one hand. I can elaborate further if you like, give you the five-finger versions, elucidate the puns as best I can…

    • Sorry for the delay here…

      Yes, I’d love to hear more–whatever you’d like to do and have the time and patience for would be of great further interest to me! I had no idea that there was a whole punning-aspect to numbers for Egyptians…it would be possible to do the same in English, certainly, but one might have to have a particular accent to pull it off. A Cockney punning on “eight” and “hate,” for example, but also “eight” and “ate” would work, etc. Hmm…

      • One might compare the joke about “why six is afraid of seven”: because “seven nine”.

        I will try to write something up for you on the language of these puns. For now, here’s an example of the shorter, five-finger version, from CT spell 398: “May you go aboard the ferry-boat, because you know the number of your fingers: One alone; he has inherited from you because I am content. Two, two; he has passed by the second of two. Three, three; he has become three because of the second of my two. Four; one is plucked out and two are in pain. Five; the second is placed for him and my (?) one is among the sealed documents.”

      • The joke above should have had the punchline “because seven ate nine”; I put ‘ate’ in triangular brackets, which is apparently some kind of html code that makes things disappear.

      • Ah, right…that makes so much more sense! I was reading that joke over and over again, and going “Why is my dyslexic brain not getting this! Feck! English is my native language!” ;)

        (Then I wondered, is there some sort of Star Trek: Voyager joke in this, i.e. Seven of Nine, or something…so, six is afraid of the Borg or something…?!?)

        Anything in angle brackets gets parsed as html on here, alas…which means that a lot of French people who are trying to use them to indicate quotations are out-of-luck, etc.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 126 other followers